The Impact of Ending No-Fault Divorce and Why We Must Protect It In New Jersey
No-fault divorce has been a part of New Jersey divorce law for years. No-fault divorce allows couples to divorce amicably by saying “irreconcilable differences,” a solution that has worked for thousands of New Jersey couples who want to move on with their lives without the drama. But some conservative groups and legislators are pushing to get rid of no-fault divorce, saying it will strengthen family values and reduce divorce rates. If New Jersey considers ending no-fault divorce, the consequences will be huge, socially, economically and emotionally. This article will explore what that means for everything from domestic violence survivors to the courts. What is No-Fault Divorce? No-fault divorce allows couples to divorce without assigning blame or fault to one spouse. Instead of proving adultery, cruelty, abandonment, or other causes of divorce, spouses can just say “irreconcilable differences.” In New Jersey, no-fault divorce is available on these grounds and is an alternative to fault-based divorce. The purpose of no-fault divorce is to reduce conflict, simplify the divorce process and protect individual privacy. Fault-based divorce requires one spouse to make allegations of blame for the divorce in the initial filing and, eventually, prove something against the other which can lead to long and nasty court proceedings. Social Impacts of Ending No-Fault Divorce Impact on Domestic Violence Survivors One of the biggest impacts of no-fault divorce going away would be on domestic violence victims. No-fault divorce is a lifeline for survivors to get out of abusive relationships without having to face their abuser in a long, blame-based legal battle. According to advocates like the National Organization for Women (NOW), getting rid of no-fault divorce would force abuse survivors to endure even more trauma as they would have to prove their partner’s wrongdoing in court. This would put victims in even more danger as they may be forced to stay in unsafe relationships because of the complexities and risks of a fault-based divorce. Impact on Children Children are often in the middle of divorce and no-fault divorce laws minimize the emotional impact on them. By avoiding fault-based arguments, no-fault divorce keeps parental conflict to a minimum so children can adjust to new family dynamics more easily. Without a no-fault option, children would have to witness their parents blaming each other in court. Research shows that children of high-conflict divorce are more likely to develop emotional and behavioral issues which can have long-term effects on their well-being. Social Stigma and Judgment No-fault divorce has reduced the social stigma of divorce by making it more accessible and less adversarial. Going back to a fault-based system would reverse that progress, especially for women who will face more judgment and blame for the divorce. This stigma would disproportionately affect women who choose to leave a marriage for valid personal reasons like unfulfilling or toxic relationships but don’t meet the high burden of proof in a fault-based system. And the fear of public judgment would keep some people from getting a divorce altogether and stay in unhealthy or unhappy relationships. Economic Impact of Ending No-Fault Divorce Financial Burden The financial aspect of fault-based divorce is a big consideration. When fault has to be proven, divorces can become longer, more complicated, and more expensive. The need to gather evidence, present witnesses and argue each side of the case means higher legal fees and more court dates. For lower income couples the increased financial burden of a fault divorce could be a huge barrier to getting a divorce and some may not have the resources to get a divorce at all. Also, since the allegations of fault must be made in the initial filing with the Court, the case starts off even more adversarial and contentious than it would have otherwise. Workplace Productivity and Financial Stability Divorce stress can affect work productivity, and the prolonged nature of a fault-based divorce will only make it worse. Long legal battles combined with financial uncertainty can strain an individual’s mental health and focus and affect their work performance. A fault-based divorce system will have a ripple effect and impact not only the individual’s financial stability but also local businesses and workplaces in New Jersey. Property Division and Alimony In no-fault divorce, property division and alimony awards are generally more straightforward as these are decided without who’s at fault. Even under a fault-based divorce, courts do not generally take the “fault” of one party into consideration when awarding alimony or dividing marital assets and liabilities. This means there is little, to no, legal benefit of filing under a fault-based cause of action for divorce. What Ending No-Fault Divorce Means for Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Women’s Self Determination and Safety The passage of no-fault divorce laws in the 1970s was a big win for women’s rights, giving women more autonomy and safety in their marriages. Advocates say repealing no-fault divorce will roll back that progress and limit women’s ability to leave marriages on their own terms. As NOW and Ms. Magazine put it, going back to fault-based divorce will have particularly devastating effects on women who are already disadvantaged due to financial dependency or abusive relationships. The ability to divorce without blame has given countless women the freedom to pursue their own independence; taking that away would undermine that freedom. Economic Inequality for Women In fault-based systems women are more vulnerable to financial hit, especially if they don’t have the resources to prove their partner’s fault. Historically women have faced economic disadvantage post-divorce as they often take on primary caregiving responsibilities that limit their earning potential. No-fault divorce helps to level the playing field by allowing for a faster and less adversarial process. Repealing no-fault divorce will only make these inequalities worse and could force many women into long and costly legal battles. Historical Context and No-Fault Divorce Advocacy The push for no-fault divorce was a response to an unfair system that left individuals, especially women, financially and socially disadvantaged. Repealing no-fault divorce will unravel decades of progress in family
The Impact of Ending No-Fault Divorce and Why We Must Protect It In New Jersey Read More »